THE MOST VILEST SIN OF ALL
by Lewis E. Thomas

THE MOST VILEST SIN OF ALL!
 
LORD, how do abortion mills find so many Doctors "willing to murder" the unborn!
A child is a gift from you, so the act of abortion "must" fill you with great scorn!
 
The abortion Doctor dismembers the unborn children one body part at a time!
And then clocks out at 5:00 to go home believing he/she has committed no crime!
 
They go home to embrace their own children after murdering "other" children all day?
Children who "never" had a chance to see the light of day!
 
The Mothers walk away with innocent blood on their hands, heads held high!
As God and the Angels in Heaven look down on it all and cry!
 
This is an evil business run by the "FORCES OF HELL", killing 3,500 children a day!
It has murdered 58,000,000 unborn children since 1973 Roe v Wade!
 
The Supreme Court Justices decided to interpret the word "LIBERTY" to mean:
"Liberty" grants freedom to start up a bloody child killing machine!
 
Senator Lindsey Graham said, "If the word Liberty = X it can be applied to allow/fit anything!
It can then grant license or freedom to commit things horrible and obscene!
 
How can only 5 unelected Judges rule that the word "LIBERTY" grants freedom to murder an unborn child!
Oh God, how our Nation has become so evil, corrupted and vile!
 
They have cast aside all moral/holy restraint as Aaron did when he allowed the Jews to build a Calf of Gold!
Judges who've abandoned God to "grant the wishes of the lost" thereby forfeiting their eternal souls!
 
Lord, a new Planned Parenthood building now stands "PROUDLY" in our town!
What used to be Prime Real Estate is now an "UNHOLY KILLING GROUND"!
 
LORD, I HOPE EVERYONE WHO PASSES EACH DAY THERE BY!
WILL KNOW PRECIOUS UNBORN CHILDREN ARE BEING PROCESSED THERE TO DIE!
 
Lord, I beg you to "INTERCEDE", to PLEASE HEAR MY PLEA AND MY CALL!
To stop "ABORTION"!
 "THE MOST VILEST SIN OF THEM ALL!"
 
 
Lewis E. Thomas
As given by God on 9/10/2018
 
Psalm 127:3-5
Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth. Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.
 
Roe v Wade during Kavanaugh Hearings:

WASHINGTON, D.C., September 6, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, pressed Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court divining “rights” that aren’t in the Constitution’s text, specifically citing abortion and Roe v. Wade.

Graham asked Kavanaugh during Thursday's hearings on whether the Constitution explicitly mentions a “right” to abortion. “Is anything written in the document?”

“Senator, the Supreme Court has recognized the right to abortion,” Kavanaugh answered. “It has reaffirmed it many times.” Graham pressed him on whether the court specifically found abortion was in a particular clause of the Constitution.

"It's a pretty simple ‘no, it's not, Senator Graham,’” the senator quipped. “Is there any phrase in the Constitution about abortion?”

“The Supreme Court has found it under the Liberty Clause, but you’re right that the specific word” is not there, Kavanaugh admitted. Graham then noted that the Liberty Clause did not specifically mention abortion, either.

“Here’s the point: what are the limits on this concept?” he asked. “What are the checks and balances on people in your business, if you can find five people who agree with you, to confer a right, whether the public likes it or not, based on this concept of a penumbra of rights? What are the outer limits to this?”

Kavanaugh responded by invoking Washington v. Glucksberg, which upheld a state ban on assisted suicide. It established a test for determining unenumerated rights (i.e., rights not explicitly spelled out), which in Kavanaugh’s words boiled down to whether the “right” in question was “rooted in the history and tradition of the country, so as to prevent … ”

Graham interrupted him to ask if there was any abortion right rooted in America’s history or tradition. Kavanaugh attempted to fall back on current Supreme Court abortion precedent, but Graham questioned how the Roe court concluded that abortion had such roots, then reiterated his challenge about limits on the court’s power to decide “liberty” means whatever they decide.

Kavanaugh suggested that Congress was ultimately powerless to defy the Supreme Court’s interpretation of liberty, and that a constitutional amendment would be the only recourse in such situations.

The reason some legal scholars object to this concept, it’s breathtakingly unlimited. Whatever any five people believe at any time in history, because of the word liberty, they can rewrite our history,” Graham concluded. “And I think the best way for democracies to make history is to have the courts interpret the Constitution, be a check and balance on us, but not take one word and create a concept that is breathtaking in terms of its application to restrict the legislative process.”

The exchange offers more mixed signals in the continuing efforts to predict Kavanaugh’s stance on Roe. Conservatives hope and liberals fear he would provide the long-awaited fifth vote to overturn it and let states and Congress directly vote on whether abortion should be legal.

His suggestion that unenumerated rights must be “rooted in the history and traditions of the country” may be further evidence he opposes Roe; in a 2017 speechon the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Kavanaugh cited the fact that his “first judicial hero” could “not reach such a conclusion about abortion.”

 
 


...

Article Source: http://www.faithwriters.com







Thanks!

Thank you for sharing this information with the author, it is greatly appreciated so that they are able to follow their work.

Close this window & Print